Middle Market Private Equity M&A Activity – Q3 2018

Middle Market Private Equity M&A Activity – Q3 2018

Executive Summary

Average Valuations are Slightly Down

The aggregate EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.3x for Q3 2018 is in line with the multiples observed over the last few quarters, but valuations have tapered off compared to the 7.5-8.0x seen in the latter half of 2017.

Leaning Towards Conservatism

It appears that private equity firms are preferring to use less debt in their acquisition efforts.  Despite plenty of capital available in the leveraged finance market, total debt/EBITDA has decreased, and the percentage of deals using less than the maximum amount of leverage allowed is rising.

Headwinds for Sectors Trying to Stay “In Favor”

Technology and health care were once again leaders in terms of highest average valuations, but their multiples in 2018 are lower compared to last year.

Also of note is the media & telecom sector.  This industry had an average EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.2x in 2017 (second highest among all sectors) but sharply fell to just 5.0x in 2018 (lowest among all sectors).

Based on our review of GF Data’s latest M&A Report, Q3 2018 was a mixed bag of indicators for the private equity transaction arena.  63 transactions were reported by more than 200 private equity firms in the quarter.  This is an increase over the 47 transactions reported last quarter and the 53 transactions reported in Q3 a year ago.  However, total transactions are slightly down from the 71 and 67 that were reported in Q4 2017 and Q1 2018, respectively.  Just 177 transactions have been reported for 2018 thus far, so we will need to see a slightly faster pace if we are to keep up with 249 transactions reported last year. Middle Market Private Equity.

We also note that multiples, in terms of total enterprise value (EV) to EBITDA, were slightly down.  While two sectors reported higher multiples in Q3 than in Q2, most sectors declined.  In aggregate, EV/EBITDA multiples averaged 7.3x for Q3 2018.  This is down from 7.4x last quarter, 7.5x in the same quarter last year, and a high of 8.0x observed in Q4 2017.  Not surprisingly, targets with larger enterprise values were acquired at higher multiples.  In Q3, companies with enterprise values in the ranges of both $50-100M and $100-250M were acquired at 8.6x EBITDA, whereas companies in the $10-25M range were acquired at 5.8x EBITDA and $25-50M companies were acquired at 7.1x EBITDA.

Middle Market Private Equity

Industry Analysis

To get a better understanding of the mixed M&A trends, we took a deeper dive into the report and analyzed the various industry classifications of the acquisition targets. 

Middle Market Private Equity

Manufacturing

Manufacturing valuations have largely hovered in the low-to-mid 6x range since 2014, although they have trended upwards in the past two years.  Recent EV/EBITDA multiples observed include 6.8x in 2017 and 6.9x in 2018.  This is in comparison to an average of just 6.3x from 2014 to 2016.  However, there has been an apparent drop in recent deal volume.  Only 56 transactions have been reported in 2018 thus far, compared to an average of over 100 from 2014 to 2017.  Time will tell if Q4 activity will pick up and get manufacturing M&A volume back to historical levels. 

Mergers And Acquisitions

Business Services

While the average EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.0x for 2018 dipped slightly compared to the 7.3x in 2016 and 7.4x in 2017, EV/EBITDA multiples for the business services sector are still higher than their 2014 to 2017 average of 6.8x.  As another positive, volume is up for this sector in 2018 with 48 transactions already reported through just three quarters compared to only 44 and 41 in each of the previous two years.

Mergers And Acquisitions

Health Care Services

Both M&A multiples and volume are down for the health care sector.  EV/EBITDA multiples have averaged just 7.5x so far in 2018.  This is lower than the 7.8x, 7.6x, and 8.1x multiples observed in the last three years.  Volume is also down, with just 19 reported transactions in 2018 thus far compared to an average of 24 over the past three years.  However, if Q4 can keep the same pace as the first three quarters, 2018 could finish in line with average volume. 

Middle Market Private Equity M&Amp;A Activity - Q3 2018

Distribution

As of now, 2018 appears to be a lackluster year for M&A activity within the distribution industry.  The average EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.0x so far in 2018 is moderately lower than the 7.5x and 7.7x seen in 2016 and 2017, respectively.  Volume is also down thus far, with just 13 transactions reported in 2018 compared to twice as many (26) reported last year.  We still have one more quarter of data to digest, but with multiples and volume both appearing lower, we won’t be holding our breath for any magic in the distribution sector in 2018.

Middle Market Private Equity M&Amp;A Activity - Q3 2018

Retail

Retail showed signs of recovering with EV/EBITDA multiples of 7.0x and 7.6x in 2016 and 2017, respectively.  However, multiples have dropped to just 6.7x thus far in 2018.  On a positive note though, this is still higher than the EV/EBITDA multiples of 6.0x in 2015 and 5.5x in 2016.  Retail will be a key industry to watch regarding growth for the overall economy. 

Middle Market Private Equity M&Amp;A Activity - Q3 2018

Media & Telecom

At first glance, the media & telecom sector had a significant drop in its average EV/EBITDA multiple.  However, a closer look reveals that the average multiple of 8.2x for 2017 was largely inflated compared to the sector’s average EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.5x for 2015 and 2016.  This perhaps could have been influenced by numerous large mergers in the industry including Disney and Fox, AT&T and Time Warner, and others.

Middle Market Private Equity M&Amp;A Activity - Q3 2018

Technology

From 2014 to 2016, technology EV/EBITDA multiples averaged a respectable 7.7x.  Multiples then rocketed to an average of 10.2x in 2017.  It appears that this was not an anomaly as 2018 multiples have averaged 9.8x through Q3.  As “fin-tech”, cyber security, and data analytics continue to grow in popularity, we expect technology multiples to finish 2018 on a strong note and remain elevated into 2019.

Middle Market Private Equity M&Amp;A Activity - Q3 2018

Information in this article is based on the GF Data November MA Report dated November 19, 2018.  GF Data provides private equity sponsored merger and acquisition information for middle market companies with enterprise values between $10M – $250M.

For more information, contact:

 

Ten Reasons to Get a Business Valuation Prior to a Transaction!

Top Ten Reasons to get a Valuation

Business owners and shareholders cannot adequately plan for a sale or merger unless they understand the price that the business will bring in a fair transaction.  In order to know this price, an appropriate valuation is required.

Top Ten Reasons To Get A ValuationThe right valuation will:

  1. Clearly indicate the value and value drivers of the business, arming sellers with the tools necessary to negotiate the best possible price.
  2. Identify how to support a higher value prior to the sale by adjusting for related-party transactions and/or expenses (e.g., owners’ compensation, related-party leases, and other perks).
  3. Help determine the optimal time for a sale by gaining an understanding of general M&A trends and specific trends in your industry.
  4. Show expected future wealth and returns under multiple scenarios: hold for now, sell all or some, recapitalize with debt or new equity partners, bring in a strategic partner, invest new capital for growth, etc.
  5. Help with retirement planning by structuring a transaction to minimize estate taxes.
  6. Help determine optimal transaction terms, lowering risk and improving returns.
  7. Show you how your business compares to your peers. This will help identify areas to increase the value of the business.
  8. Show the “intrinsic value” of the business under current ownership and the “fair market value” of the business to others.
  9. Assess and demonstrate synergies to a specific-buyer, supporting that they could pay a price above the fair market value, and still earn above-market expected returns.
  10. Help identify the segments of your business that are most valuable, allowing management to focus on those areas that will most impact the overall business’ value.

For more information, contact:

Marty Hanan is the founder and President of ValueScope, Inc., a valuation and financial advisory firm that specializes in valuing assets and businesses and in helping business owners in business transactions and estate planning.  Mr. Hanan is a Chartered Financial Analyst and has a B.S. Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois and an MBA from Loyola University of Chicago.

If you liked this blog you may enjoy reading some of our other blogs here.

Simple Analysis is Never a Solution in Valuing Complex Derivative Securities

Valuing Complex Derivative SecuritiesValuing Complex Derivative Securities

Even though private equity fund managers are in the business of sourcing and investing daunting amounts of money into a variety of private companies, their mindset often resembles that of the businesses in which they invest. In their 2015 Annual US PE Fund breakdown, Pitchbook identified the average size of a PE firm in 2015 was $177,000,000. Assuming a pretty standard annual management fee of 2%, the fund manager of an average PE fund in 2015 “earned” $3,540,000 of revenue from management fees…and probably close to $0 in free cash flow. This is because they spend their revenue like most small businesses; on human resources, rent, travel & entertainment, infrastructure, capital formation with potential investors, and marketing to potential portfolio companies.

PE Fund managers typically don’t achieve “free cash flow” until they begin to harvest their portfolio company investments 5-10 years into their fund’s lifespan. On top of that, unlike most business owners, they typically don’t get to participate in the profits of their labor until their investors first recover a preferred annual return somewhere in the neighborhood of 8%. Said differently, on a $177,000,000 fund, they have to return $14,160,000 per year before they can participate in the incremental profits of the fund! For a $177,000,000 fund, that’s about $70 million over 5 years!

While the image of a “vulture” private equity firm descending upon the salt-of-the-earth family-run enterprise has become ingrained in pop culture and the political discourse, the fact is that the vast majority of private equity firms are run just like small businesses too. Entrepreneurs should keep this in mind the next time a Private Equity fund contacts them about a prospective growth investment or buy-out.


Tags: Valuing Complex Derivative Securities

Dr. Scott Hakala has extensive practical knowledge of finance, economics, statistics, and business valuation theory. His expertise includes: corporate finance, restructuring and cost of capital; the valuation of securities and business interests (transactions, mergers, acquisitions, fairness opinions); the valuation of intangible assets (patents, trademarks); analysis of publicly traded securities (insider trading studies, trading analyses, event analyses, materiality, damages in securities litigation); expert testimony and economic loss analyses (commercial litigation); wage and compensation determination (reasonable compensation studies, lost personal income, wrongful termination); transfer pricing; derivative securities (options pricing and valuation); and antitrust and industry structure, strategic pricing, marketing and cost allocation analyses.

If you liked this blog you may enjoy reading some of our other blogs here.

Subscribe

Click here to subscribe to our blog.

We will never share your data!

 

Are most Private Equity fund managers small business owners too?

Private Equity Fund Managers Small Business OwnersPrivate Equity Fund Managers Small Business Owners?

Even though private equity fund managers are in the business of sourcing and investing daunting amounts of money into a variety of private companies, their mindset often resembles that of the businesses in which they invest. In their 2015 Annual US PE Fund breakdown, Pitchbook identified the average size of a PE firm in 2015 was $177,000,000. Assuming a pretty standard annual management fee of 2%, the fund manager of an average PE fund in 2015 “earned” $3,540,000 of revenue from management fees…and probably close to $0 in free cash flow. This is because they spend their revenue like most small businesses; on human resources, rent, travel & entertainment, infrastructure, capital formation with potential investors, and marketing to potential portfolio companies.

PE Fund managers typically don’t achieve “free cash flow” until they begin to harvest their portfolio company investments 5-10 years into their fund’s lifespan. On top of that, unlike most business owners, they typically don’t get to participate in the profits of their labor until their investors first recover a preferred annual return somewhere in the neighborhood of 8%. Said differently, on a $177,000,000 fund, they have to return $14,160,000 per year before they can participate in the incremental profits of the fund! For a $177,000,000 fund, that’s about $70 million over 5 years!

While the image of a “vulture” private equity firm descending upon the salt-of-the-earth family-run enterprise has become ingrained in pop culture and the political discourse, the fact is that the vast majority of private equity firms are run just like small businesses too. Entrepreneurs should keep this in mind the next time a Private Equity fund contacts them about a prospective growth investment or buy-out.

Christopher C. Lucas, CFA, CPA

PRINCIPAL
clucas@valuescopeinc.com
Full Bio →